point no 94 A man, aged thirty years, shall marry a maiden of twelve who pleases him, or a man of twenty-four a girl eight years of age; if (the performance of) his duties would (otherwise) be impeded, (he must marry) sooner.– it is mentioned that he should marry at that age , but it is no where implied that she is given off in wedding without the consent of her and her parents. It is not a forceful marriage like your prophet muhammad who pursuaded abu bakr to marry his daughter to him just as a warprize of some sorts. So if a man is implied to marry little girl it doesn’t mean that girl would be consummated at the tender age. If you think that “pleasing” mean only sex to you, then you must be a moron, pleasing can be honesty, love and sincerity and standing by your husband no matter what problem may arise. We people will treat female as a god or divine energy so we doesn’t see her as just a commodity of sex, we rather see that female can be our loving mother, supporting sister and also wife as second mother who takes care of our daily needs, But if it still bothers you as pedophilia then you are a moron. “Karyeshu Dasi, Kareneshu mantri, vidhya dharitri, bhojyeshu mata, kshmaya dharitri, shayaneshu rambha”, — meaning A wife can not only be an object of sex rather she is honest servant of duty, a supporter in the matter of confusion or the minister of advice in the matter of problem and also she is a learned woman and also she is the cook who nourishes her husband the same way his mother would take care of him, kshmaya dharitri meaning she is just like the great earth which forgives all our sins but still supports and helps us and finally she is also object of lust. you may notice that the sex comes last in this, why because wife is not just a sex object, she is the second mother. so point no 94 is not valid in some terms but still can be ignored as flaw in manu smruti as smruti means man made revelations which may be followed or ignored. But not many implemented manu’s laws, but why your prophet did that ha, and also don’t give me lecture about child marriage because it started due to your muslim invaders started raping everything that moves which had no guardian like father/husband. Please answer that, while I admit manu smruti had it’s flaws still it had good laws like point 91, 92,93. and also “Yatra naryantu pujyante, ramante tatru devata” meaning that in a society where women are happy there gods will be pleased and will bless that society. manu smruti law 94 can’t be the sole reason to leave hinduism as it is just a suggestion not commanded for every man to follow by our gods, unlike muhammad who commanded to slay unbelievers. he copied various customs from our religion like circling the idols, while we do in clockwise, muslims circle the kaaba in anti clockwise, also he borrowed om from us in the form of number 786 place the number 786 in mirror you will get 687 which in devanagari script placed in a manner to form om. we pray east while your guys will pray west and head shaving while in piligrimage to kabba is borrowed from us which we do to show respect to god and finally the idol at kabba is a shivling which symbolises creation in the form of vagina and a penis (it may sound dirty to you muslims because sex is all you think, but think logically what better way to represent creationism of god to worship than that). finally muhammad married aisha when she was aged 6 not 9 and consummated her while she was of age 9 not 13.
But here's the thing, Virginia. After a minute or so I am feeling kind of fired up. I'm feeling like I'm ready to go. So I join in the chant. It feels good. For the rest of the day, even after we left Greenwood, even though it was still raining, even though I was still not getting big crowds anywhere, even though we hadn't gotten the endorsement from the people we were hoping for, somehow I felt a little lighter, a little better. I'd see my staff and I would say "Are you fired up? and they would say "We are fired up, boss, are you ready to go?" And I'd say "I'm ready to go."
In fact, a similar anger exists within segments of the white community. Most working- and middle-class white Americans don't feel that they have been particularly privileged by their race. Their experience is the immigrant experience - as far as they're concerned, no one's handed them anything, they've built it from scratch. They've worked hard all their lives, many times only to see their jobs shipped overseas or their pension dumped after a lifetime of labor. They are anxious about their futures, and feel their dreams slipping away; in an era of stagnant wages and global competition, opportunity comes to be seen as a zero sum game, in which your dreams come at my expense. So when they are told to bus their children to a school across town; when they hear that an African American is getting an advantage in landing a good job or a spot in a good college because of an injustice that they themselves never committed; when they're told that their fears about crime in urban neighborhoods are somehow prejudiced, resentment builds over time.